Allowed

Smt C.Sriranjanamma, W/o.Adinarayana Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Telangana HC18 Sept 2013WP/27155/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order in a batch of writ petitions holds that registering authorities cannot insist on prior No Objection Certificates from Revenue Authorities for immovable property registration. The Court directed authorities to register documents fulfilling the Registration and Stamp Acts requirements without such NOCs.

What did the court decide?

Registering Authorities directed to receive and process documents and register them without insisting on Revenue NOCs if statutory requirements are met.

Smt C.Sriranjanamma, W/o.Adinarayana Reddy, Vs The… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.27155 of 2013 & batch

¶3

(W.P. Nos.27155, 27193, 27198, 27200, 27202 & 27204 of 2013)

¶4

Date: September 18, 2013

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.27155 of 2013:

¶6

Between: Smt. C. Sriranjanamma. … Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

1. The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad & 4 others. Respondents

¶9

¶10

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

¶11

WRIT PETITION No.27155 of 2013 & batch

¶12

(W.P. Nos.27155, 27193, 27198, 27200, 27202 & 27204 of 2013)

¶13

COMMON ORDER:

¶14

The grievance of the petitioners in this batch of cases is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificates’ (NOCs) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the documents presented by them for registration in connection with immovable properties.

¶15

2. This Court has time and again held that there is no legal sanction for the action of the Registration Authorities in insisting upon such certification from the Revenue Authorities before entertaining documents for registration. Further, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued Memo No.49938/Regn.I/A1/2012-4 dated 06.12.2012 requesting the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, to instruct all the Registering Officers in the State not to ask for NOCs from the Revenue Authorities before registration and not to act on any such NOCs.

¶16

3. In the light of the above, it is not open to the Registering Authorities to continue to insist upon prior certification by the Revenue Authorities before receiving and registering documents pertaining to immovable properties.

¶17

4. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of directing the Registering Authorities concerned to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioners without insisting upon such NOCs and in the event the documents presented fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, they shall register and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. If, however, the Registering Authority concerned is of the opinion that the document presented for registration warrants denial, he

¶18

shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. Pending W.P.M.Ps in this batch of cases shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No costs.

¶19

____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J

¶20

Date: September 18, 2013 BSB

¶21

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

¶22

WRIT PETITION No.27155 of 2013 & batch

¶23

(W.P. Nos.27155, 27193, 27198, 27200, 27202 & 27204 of 2013)

¶24

Date: September 18, 2013

¶25

BSB

Smt C.Sriranjanamma, W/o.Adinarayana Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt C.Sriranjanamma, W/o.Adinarayana Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaduputi Babu, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the

M/s. Sri Ramanjaneya Saw Mill, Vs The Divisional Forest Officer

G.R.Nagabhushanam Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Smt Sharifa Bee Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Rudrakshala Roja Suryakumari, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

T.Reddeppa Reddy, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal