The Single Judge held that the writ petition before the Court did not survive for adjudication and accordingly dismissed it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.26194 OF 2003
Date: 05.09.2013
Between:
M/s. M.M.Home Applicances
…Petitioner
And The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Government of Andhra Pradesh Excise Commercial Taxes complex M.J.Road Nampally Hyderabad, and another
…Respondents
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.26194 OF 2003
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
____________ G.ROHINI, J
____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date: 05.09.2013 Mva
M/s. M.M.Home Applicances
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Government of Andhra Pradesh
Excise Commercial Taxes complex M.J.Road Nampally Hyderabad
G. ROHINI
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
