Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the merger of university departments. The petition was rejected due to lack of locus standi as the petitioner completed post-graduation and was not affected by the restructuring, and no legal right was impaired. No costs awarded.
Writ petition dismissed with no costs to be paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.25123 of 2013
ORDER:
Petitioner has stated in paragraph 8 of the affidavit that he has completed M.A. (Linguistics) during the year 2012. However, he seeks to question the impugned proceedings of the Vice-Chancellor, Ex.P-1, dated 11.07.2013, whereunder the Vice-Chancellor issued orders for merger of certain Departments of the University based upon the draft report of the High Power Committee on the rationalization of staffing pattern in the Universities of Andhra Pradesh and report of the NAAC Peer Team on Institutional Accreditation of S.V. University, Tirupati. The challenge by the petitioner is to the proposal with regard to merger of Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages with the Department of Telugu Studies.
Since the petitioner has already completed his Post Graduation, he has no cause with regard to the administrative decisions of the University accepting recommendation for restructuring of the Departments of the University. In spite of my repeated queries, the petitioner’s counsel was not able to satisfy the locus standi of the petitioner to sustain the challenge as he is no way affected by the restructuring of departments and administrative decisions of Vice-Chancellor. I am, therefore, not satisfied with the writ petitioner’s bona fides and locus standi.
I am also not satisfied that any legal right of the petitioner is affected as no Department is being abolished but it is only a case of merger for administrative convenience.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR 3rd September, 2013 KL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.25123 of 2013
3rd September, 2013
KL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has sufficient locus standi to challenge the administrative decision of merging university departments.
Unspecified Petitioner
Vice-Chancellor
VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
