Division Bench dismissed writ appeals filed by the A.P. Housing Board challenging single Judge orders that restored plots to allottees who defaulted on installments. The dismissal was based on a subsequent Division Bench ruling approving similar orders.
Writ appeals dismissed; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SRI N.V. RAMANA and
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Writ Appeal Nos. 915, 918 & 932 of 2013
DATED: 28..06..2013
Between: W.A.No.915 of 2013
A.P. Housing Board, Gruhakalpa Building, Hyderabad rep. by its Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner & another
… Appellants
And
M. Venu Mudiraj, Hyderabad
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SRI N.V. RAMANA and
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Writ Appeal Nos. 915, 918 & 932 of 2013
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Sri N.V. Ramana)
These writ appeals are filed by the A.P. Housing Board
(hereinafter referred to ‘the Board’) against the common order passed by the learned single Judge, allowing the W.P.Nos.34461 of 2011 & Batch, filed by the writ petitioners/Respondents, who have defaulted in payment of installments as per the schedule given by the Board, and directing the appellants-Board to restore the respective plots to the writ petitioners by revoking the cancellation of allotments.
However, at the time of hearing, it is fairly brought to our notice by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Appellants-Board that subsequently a Division Bench of this Court has dismissed a similar batch of writ appeals filed by the Board, and approved the orders of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.No.34464 of 2012 & Batch, dated 03-07-2012, and that the Board has even implemented the order of the learned single Judge.
In that view of the matter, we see no ground to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the learned single Judge, especially in view of the decision of a Division Bench of this Court, dismissing similar batch of writ appeals and confirming the order of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.No.34464 of 2011 & Batch, dated 03-07-2012, which was even implemented by the Appellants-Board.
Therefore, the writ appeals are dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed accordingly. No costs.
________________ N.V. RAMANA, J
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J
Dt. 28..06.2013 Kv
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SRI N.V. RAMANA and
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Writ Appeal Nos. 915, 918 & 932 of 2013 (Common Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice Sri N.V. Ramana)
28..06..2013
Kv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeals filed by the A.P. Housing Board against the order restoring plots to defaulting allottees should be allowed in light of a subsequent Division Bench decision approving similar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.34464 of 2012 & Batch, dated 03-07-2012Followed¶16
A.P. Housing Board
M. Venu Mudiraj
N.V. Ramana
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
