The court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the appellant, who requested permission on October 29, 2013. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission for withdrawal of appeal granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL
F.C.A.No. 224 of 2010
ORDER : (Per LNR,,J)
The learned counsel for the appellant filed a letter, dated 29.10.2013, stating that the appellant instructed her to withdraw the appeal and, accordingly, sought for permission.
Permission is accorded, and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
The Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand dismissed.
______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
______________________ M.S.K.
JAISWAL, J. 4th November, 2013 cbs
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL
F.C.A.No.224 of 2010
4th November, 2013
cbs
L. NARASIMHA REDDY
M.S.K. JAISWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
