These two Family Court Appeals are between the same parties and in relation to the same properties. The sole respondent is no more and her daughter is brought on record as the legal representative through order, dated 22.01.2013. The sole appellant is the husband of the original respondent. While the appellant filed O.S.No.100 of 2003 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, for a declaration to the effect that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for recovery thereof, the deceased1st respondent filed O.S.No.208 of 2000 for cancellation of gift deed, dated 23.05.1996 executed by her in favour of the appellant. Through a common judgment, dated 14.07.2005, the trial Court dismissed O.S.No.100 of 2003 and decreed O.S.No.208 of 2000. Hence, these two appeals. A compromise has been entered into between the appellant and her daughter, 2nd respondent herein. The appellant had executed a gift deed, dated 25.05.2013, through which he gifted the first floor of the suit schedule premises to the 2nd respondent. Both the parties appeared before the Court and filed compromise memos, incorporating the said conditions. On verification they have vouched for the truthfulness and correctness of the contents of the memos. The parties and in particular, the 2nd respondent has stated that the settlement was arrived
