The court disposed of two Family Court appeals based on a compromise memo entered between the appellant husband and the deceased respondent's daughter. The appellant had gifted property to the daughter, and the parties confirmed the settlement was voluntary.
Appeals disposed of in terms of the compromise memos filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
F.C.A.No.181 and 182 of 2005
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J)
These two Family Court Appeals are between the same parties and in relation to the same properties. The sole respondent is no more and her daughter is brought on record as the legal representative through order, dated 22.01.2013. The sole appellant is the husband of the original respondent. While the appellant filed O.S.No.100 of 2003 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, for a declaration to the effect that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for recovery thereof, the deceased1st respondent filed O.S.No.208 of 2000 for cancellation of gift deed, dated 23.05.1996 executed by her in favour of the appellant. Through a common judgment, dated 14.07.2005, the trial Court dismissed O.S.No.100 of 2003 and decreed O.S.No.208 of 2000. Hence, these two appeals. A compromise has been entered into between the appellant and her daughter, 2nd respondent herein. The appellant had executed a gift deed, dated 25.05.2013, through which he gifted the first floor of the suit schedule premises to the 2nd respondent. Both the parties appeared before the Court and filed compromise memos, incorporating the said conditions. On verification they have vouched for the truthfulness and correctness of the contents of the memos. The parties and in particular, the 2nd respondent has stated that the settlement was arrived
at, on their own accord, not under any coercion or external pressure. Hence, we dispose of the appeals in terms of the compromise memos filed therein.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
S.V.BHATT, J
Date: 05.06.2013 JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
F.C.A.No.181 and 182 of 2005
Date: 05.06.2013
JSU
Appellant/Applicant (Husband)
Deceased Wife
Daughter/Legal Representative
L.NARASIMHA REDDY
S.V.BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
