The Learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that the matter was settled outside the Court, so he did not press the Company Petition.
The Company Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
COMPANY PETITION No.28 of 2013
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that, as the matter has been settled between the parties outside the Court, he does not intend to press the Company Petition.
The Company Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J
Date: 03.10.2013 usd
Petitioner
Respondent
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
