A city civil court appeal was dismissed as not pressed, following an earlier order that left nothing further for consideration.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Miscellaneous applications are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.105 of 2013
BETWEEN
M/s. Pioneer Habitation Projects, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District.
…APPELLANT
AND
G. Shankar and another.
…RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: MR. P. SHIV KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: --NONE APPEARED--
The Court made the following: -
JUDGMENT:
In view of the orders passed in CCCAMP.No.464 of 2013 dated 17.09.2013, nothing further survives for consideration in the appeal itself.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the above, therefore, the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKR, J
September 23, 2013 DSK
M/s. Pioneer Habitation Projects
G. Shankar and another
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
