T.Raju, v. Mr. Balakrishna
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition was closed as the respondent submitted that the High Court's order had been complied with, and the petitioner did not press the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed. Miscellaneous applications closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.1868 2012
(Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 27.01.2012 in WP.No.20954 of 2011.)
BETWEEN:
T. Raju.
... PETITIONER
AND
Mr. Balakrishna.
...RESPONDENT
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Raju
- respondent
Mr. Balakrishna
Coram
VILAS V AFZULPURKAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1868/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court