The court closed Contempt Case No.1075 of 2012 as the appellant (Standing Counsel for APCPDCL) represented that directions from an earlier order were complied with. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed without substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1075 of 2012
ORDER:
Sri P. Laxma Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APCPDCL represented that the directions issued by this Court in the order dated 05-03-2012 passed in W.P.No.5357 of 2012 have been complied with by issuing consequential orders.
If at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the said orders they may initiate fresh proceedings, if any.
In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
_________________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J
March 06, 2013 PN
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.1075 of 2012
March 06, 2013
PN
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
