The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the appellant despite the matter being listed for judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
A.S. NO. 846 OF 1998
Between:
M/s Venkateswara Fertilisers Co. represented by its Prop. Vedantham
………….Appellant AND
State Bank of India
………….Respondent
JUDGMENT:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for judgment’ there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It indicates that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the case.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, filed in this appeal, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J
DATE: 10.04.2013 KA
... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. 2 CD copies.
M/s Venkateswara Fertilisers Co.
State Bank of India
N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
