Vuppala Venkaiah, v. The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6902 of 2007
Date : 01.03.2012
Between :
Vuppala Venkaiah.
…..Petitioner
And
The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Government of A.P. & others.
…..Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6902 of 2007
ORDER :
It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
___________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
1st March 2012 ajr
Vuppala Venkaiah
The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Government of A.P.
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court