Writ petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's persistent absence and non-prosecution of the matter on two listed dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6611 of 2012
Dated:19.03.2012
Between:
M/s.Emergy Poultry Pvt.Ltd.
Petitioner
And
The Indian Overseas Bank.
... Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6611 of 2012
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
When the matter was called on 13.03.2012, Counsel for the petitioner was absent and there was no representation. The matter was, therefore, directed to be listed on 16.03.2012 under the caption “for dismissal”. When the Writ Petition appeared on that day, a request for adjournment was made, and the matter was adjourned. Today the matter is appearing high up in the list under the caption “for dismissal” as item No.1. In spite of the same,
Counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on his behalf.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default/nonprosecution. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
________________________________ (G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J) 19.03.2012 vs
M/s. Emergy Poultry Pvt. Ltd.
The Indian Overseas Bank
Justice V.V.S.Rao
Justice G.Krishna Mohan Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
