The writ petition, filed by G. Ramesh against the Regional Transport Officer and others, was dismissed as infructuous. Counsel stated the petitioner's vehicle had been released, rendering the grievance unsurvivable for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM And
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P. No. 31933 of 2012
DATE: 17.10.2012
Between: G. Ramesh .. Petitioner And The Regional Transport Officer & Asst. secretary and two others . Respondents
O R D E R:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Sri C.L.N. Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner’s vehicle has been released and the grievance in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
__________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 17.10.2012 _________________________ M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J bcj
G. Ramesh
The Regional Transport Officer
Asst. secretary
two others
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
