The High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order at the admission stage, relying on a previous judgment of this Court.
Appeal dismissed at the stage of admission without assigning reasons apart from reliance on precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 422 of 2012
Dated: 16-10-2012
Between: Commissioner of Income Tax Rajahmundry …Appellant And Agricultural Market Committee, Chintalapudi.
…Respondent.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 422 of 2012
Judgment (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel for the Income Tax-the appellant that this appeal preferred against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench dated 4-4-2008 in ITA No. 256/Vizag/07 requires to be dismissed and the order of the Tribunal confirmed in view of the judgment of this Court reported in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agriculture Market Committee[1] .
Recording the submission, the appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission.
_________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
16th October, 2012
_______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
GRR
[1] (2011) 336 ITR 641 (AP)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agriculture Market CommitteeReferred¶10
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agriculture Market Committee
Commissioner of Income Tax Rajahmundry
Agricultural Market Committee, Chintalapudi
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
