The Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed W.P. No.30569 of 2012 as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner did not wish to pursue the petition during the hearing held on 19.11.2012.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.30569 of 2012
Date: 19.11.2012
Between: Pochareddy Chandra Sekhar Reddy AND The Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, No.III, O/o. the Commercial Tax Officer, No.II, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District and another.
… Petitioner AND
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.30569 of 2012
ORDER (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
Sri J. Amrutha Rao, the learned counsel representing
Sri M. Subba Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Date: 19.11.2012
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
va
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.30569 of 2012
(order of the Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Date:19.11.2012
va
Pochareddy Chandra Sekhar Reddy
The Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, No.III, O/o. the Commercial Tax Officer, No.II, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District
another
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
