Appeal against Agricultural Income Tax dismissed by the High Court relying on 336 ITR 641.
Appeal dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A (SR) No.2792 of 2008
Date: 26.09.2012
Between: Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry … Appellant AND Agricultural Market Committee, Bhimavaram … Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A (SR) No.2792 of 2008
JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
It is fairly stated by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax representing the appellant that this appeal requires to be dismissed in view of the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee (reported in 336 ITR 641).
Recording the submission, the appeal is dismissed, but however without costs.
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 26.09.2012 va
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A (SR) No.2792 of 2008
(order of the Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Date: 26.09.2012
va
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agricultural Market CommitteeRelied on¶9
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee (reported in 336 ITR 641)
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry
Agricultural Market Committee, Bhimavaram
GODA RAGHURAM
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
