M. Chegamma v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed habeas corpus petition for her missing daughter. Detenue was produced by respondents and disclosed marriage. Court closed writ petition as no illegal detention found.
What did the court decide?
Habeas corpus writ petition closed; no further orders necessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT : :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.3017 of 2012
Dated: 27-02-2012
Between:
M.Chengamma
And
The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati, Chittoor District and others.
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition should be continued as the detenue was not produced before the Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Chengamma
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati
- other
Nadiya
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/3017/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court