Disposed

Sultan-ul-Uloom Educational Society v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC1 Oct 2012WP/27908/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch of writ petitions challenging the proposal to fix reduced fees for private engineering college courses was disposed of after the respondents submitted compliance with a prior interim order. Petitioners were granted liberty to approach the court for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

None. Petitions disposed of on receipt of compliance status; liberty granted to seek relief for non-compliance.

Sultan-ul-Uloom Educational Society Vs Government… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2012)

¶1

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy

¶2

Writ Petition Nos.27340, 27754, 27867, 27908, 27919, 27941 and 27952 of 2012

¶3

Dated:01.10.2012

¶4

W.P.No.27340 of 2012

¶5

Between:

¶6

Andhra Pradesh Private Engineering Colleges, Management Association (APPECMA), S.V. Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Represented by its President Sri B.S.Appa Rao … Petitioners

¶7

And

¶8

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others … Respondents

¶9

Counsel for the petitioners : Sri S.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 : Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education Counsel for the respondents 3 and 4 : Sri C.Sudesh Anand, learned Standing Counsel for APSCIIE And APFRC

¶10

The Court made the following :

¶11

COMMON ORDER:

¶12

This batch of writ petitions is filed on an apprehension that the respondents are proposing to unilaterally fix a reduced fee in respect of MBA and MCA Courses for the academic year 2012-13.

¶13

On 03.09.2012, this Court has passed a detailed interim order directing the respondents to fix the fee in the manner as indicated therein.

¶14

At the hearing, Sri C.Sudesh Anand, learned Standing Counsel representing respondent Nos.3 and 4, on instructions, submitted that the said interim order is being complied with by the said respondents and that only in cases where the petitioners failed to comply with the directions given by this Court by the said order, they are not fixing the higher fee. He has also submitted that higher fee is not being fixed in respect of those Colleges which have given affidavits agreeing for fixation of Rs.27,000/-.

¶15

The above submissions of the learned Standing Counsel are placed on record and the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail their remedies, if they feel aggrieved by noncompliance with the interim order in fixing the fee.

¶16

As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petitions, the W.P.M.Ps. filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous.

¶17

_____________________________ C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J

¶18

01.10.2012 KH

Sultan-ul-Uloom Educational Society v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sultan-ul-Uloom Educational Society v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Katukuri Devendar Reddy, Vs The District Collector (Civil Supplies)

M/s. T.M. Tyres Limited, Vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

P.Ramesh Babu Vs The District Collector (Cs), Prakasam District at Ongole

Mohd. Mazheruddin Vs Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission

M. Chandra Mohan Vs The District Cooperative Officer (Fac)

Andhra Pradesh Private Engineering Colleges Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh rep by its