The High Court allowed the petitioner's application to voluntarily withdraw her writ petition, consequently dismissing it and vacating prior interim directions.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.26965 of 2010
BETWEEN
Smt. T. Bhadramma.
PETITIONER
AND
The Managing Director, Mother Dairy, Ranga Reddy District and another.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. D.C. UMAPATHI RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR. R. SHIVA KUMAR
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, interim direction granted on 29.10.2010 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
February 8, 2012 DSK
Smt. T. Bhadramma
The Managing Director, Mother Dairy, Ranga Reddy District
another
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
