M/s.Tirumala Stone Crushers, v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition assailing an auction notice. The court held that the petitioner failed to entertain the petition because they had already invoked the jurisdiction of the Debts Recovery Tribunal and filed a prior appeal there, facts which were suppressed at the time of filing the writ.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Writ Petition NO.26521 OF 2012
DATED: 24.8.2012
Between: M/s. Tirumala Stone Crushers
… Petitioner
And State Bank of India, represented by its Authorised Officer, Main Branch, Srikakulam and another.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.26521 of 2012
Order: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Assailing the auction notice dated 20.7.2012 issued by the respondent-bank proposing to auction the properties in question, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained given that the petitioner suppressed material facts regarding prior applications to the Debts Recovery Tribunal that were dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Tirumala Stone Crushers
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/26521/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court