The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was unrepresented and no accommodation was sought. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.25895 OF 2006
DATED: 08.11.2012
Between:
PETLA UMA SHANKAR GANESH … Petitioner
And
THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION AUTHORITY VISAKHAPATNAM And OTHERS.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.25895 OF 2006
Order:
None appears for the petitioner nor any accommodation is sought for.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
08-11-2012 tnb
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.25895 OF 2006
DATED:08.11.2012
tnb
PETLA UMA SHANKAR GANESH
THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION AUTHORITY VISAKHAPATNAM
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
