A single-judge order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous after counsel's submission. No substantive legal discussion appears in the text, indicating the petition was rendered moot by external developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.25322 of 1999
ORDER:
Ms Vasudha Nagaraj, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
Date:13.09.2012 usd
Petitioner
Respondent
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
