This order dismissed as infructuous by the Acting Chief Justice a writ petition because the respondent counsel submitted that the subject matter had ceased to have any legal subsistence.
This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.22456 OF 1998
Dt: 13-09-2012.
Between:
VIJAYA FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LTD., 35, CHANDIVALI VILLAGE, OFF SAKI VIHAR ROAD, ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI REP. BY MR.KIRTI H SYONTRI OFFICER (CONTRACT) .. PETITIONER
AND VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM AND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.22456 OF 1998
ORDER:
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the subject matter in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ )
Dated: 13-09-2012.
tnb
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.22456 OF 1998
Dt: 13-09-2012.
tnb
Vijaya Fire Protection System Ltd.
Visakhapatnam Port Trust
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
