The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as 'dump rejected for default because the petitioner did not appear, as none appeared for the petitioner nor there is any representation on its behalf.',
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT: THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.21533 of 2005
Between:
The Tadikonda Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd., Tadikonda, Guntur District.
… Petitioner
And
The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Guntur District & others.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.21533 of 2005
ORDER:
When the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioner nor there is any representation on its behalf.
In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
_________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
Date: 27.09.2012 ES
The Tadikonda Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd.
The Assistant Director of Fisheries
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
