The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.16301 of 2005 for default as none of the petitioners appeared, and no representation was filed on their behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT: THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.16301 of 2005
Between:
Chennumolu Nageswara Rao & others.
… Petitioners
And
The Executive Officer, Sri Prudveswara Swamy Temple, Amaravathi Village & Mandal, Guntur District & another.
… Respondents
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.16301 of 2005
ORDER:
When the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners nor there is any representation on their behalf.
In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
_________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
Date: 27.09.2012 ES
Chennumolu Nageswara Rao & others
The Executive Officer, Sri Prudveswara Swamy Temple, Amaravathi Village & Mandal, Guntur District
another
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
