The petitioner did not appear; the court inferred a loss of interest and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
Writ Petition No. 16920 OF 2000
O R D E R:
None appears for the petitioner even today. Sri Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent is present in the court. In the circumstances, I infer that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this case. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
__________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.
Date. 23.08.2012. knk
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 16920 OF 2000
23rd August 2012
knk
Petitioner
Respondent
Nooty RamamoHana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
