Rep. by its Proprietor K.Krishna, Vs Deputy Registrar Coop.Societies/Arbitrator

The petitioner was appointed on contract basis, as Driver in the APSRTC. After some time, he was removed from service on the ground of absenteeism. No enquiry was conducted, before the order of removal was passed. Subsequently, he came to be reengaged on the basis of the orders passed by the 1^st respondent. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that while issuing order of re-engagement, the 1^st respondent did not extend the benefit of continuity of service.

¶15

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶16

learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶17

3. Identical issue was dealt with by this Court in W.P. No.8090 of 2010 through an order, dated 12-04-2010, this Court held that the contractual employees, who are re-engaged on the orders of removal being set aside, are entitled for the benefit of past service.

¶18

4. Following the same, the writ petition is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner shall be entitled to the benefit of continuity of service between the date of termination and the date of re-engagement. However, the petitioner shall not be entitled to any monetary or other benefits in pursuance of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶19

_______________ K.C. BHANU, J

¶20

June, 08, 2010 Gk.

¶21

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

¶22

WRIT PETITION No.15091 of 2011

¶23

08^th June, 2011

¶24

Gk.

Rep. by its Proprietor K.Krishna, v. Deputy Registrar Coop.Societies/Arbitrator

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rep. by its Proprietor K.Krishna, v. Deputy Registrar Coop.Societies/Arbitrator

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.SurendranProprietor Vs Arbitrator,D.R.of Co-op Societies

Mr.K.Bharathveer Kothuru Hydand Anr. Vs Coop Societies Arbitrator Hydandanr

The Hyderabad Coop.Urban Bank Ltd. Vs S.M.Hussain Rasheed