A three-judge bench dismissed a writ appeal filed by a cooperative bank, holding that the challenge was misconceived based on a precedent set by the Supreme Court in Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd.
The writ appeal is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
Writ Appeal No. 1112 of 2003
Dated: 03-08-2012
Between: The Hyderabad Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. rep. by its General Manager, Hyderabad. …Petitioner And
S.M.Hussain Rasheed and others
…Respondents.
Oral order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
In view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd. v. United Yarn Tex (P) Ltd .[1] , the challenge in this writ appeal is misconceived. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
____________________ N.V. RAMANA, J
___________________ K.C. BHANU, J 3rd August, 2012 GRR
[1] (2007) 6 SCC 236
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the challenge to the impugned judgment is misconceived in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd. v. United Yarn Tex
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Greater Bombay Coop. Bank Ltd. v. United Yarn Tex (P) LtdFollowed¶8
(2007) 6 SCC 236 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Hyderabad Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. rep. by its General Manager
S.M.Hussain Rasheed and others
GODA RAGHURAM
N. V. RAMANA
K. C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
