has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. While so, on a complaint given by the 3rd respondent, proceedings were initiated in LTR No.503/89/PNK and the Special Deputy Collector by order dated 12.10.1990 passed order of ejectment. Against the said order, CMA No.28 of 1990 was filed before the Agent to the Government and the said appeal was dismissed confirming the order of the Special Deputy Collector. Thereafter, the petitioner filed WP No.15884 of 1992 and the said writ petition was dismissed. Thereafter, Writ Appeal No.1409 of 2003 was filed, wherein the order of the Agent to the Government was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh enquiry. After remand, the appeal was re-numbered as CMA No.174 of 2005 and by impugned order, the appeal was allowed in part directing eviction of the petitioner from the extent of Ac.1.00. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred revision before the 4th respondent and also filed application for stay of operation of the eviction order. The grievance of the petitioner is that neither the revision petition nor the application for stay has been taken up for consideration by 4th respondent and no orders have been passed thereon and in the meanwhile, the Special Deputy Collector is making efforts to execute the order of eviction passed against the petitioner.
