The writ petition was dismissed not on merits but for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.10093 of 2006
Date : 15.03.2012
Between :
Smt. Jasthi Aruna.
…..Petitioner
And
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur & others.
…..Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10093 of 2006
ORDER :
This writ petition is an old identified matter, posted in the caption ‘old identified matters’ at 2.15 p.m. Inspite of the same, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
___________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J
15th March 2012 ajr
Smt. Jasthi Aruna
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
