The Acting Chief Justice held that the subject matter of the writ appeal was identical to a previously disposed writ appeal (W.A.No.315 of 2012) and disposed of the matter accordingly without separate reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1438 OF 2012
Dt: 20-11-2012.
Between:
CHALLA RAM REDDY .. APPELLANT
AND
GOVT. OF INDIA REP. BY ITS DEPUTY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS FREEDOM FIGHTERS DIVISION LOKNAYAK BHAVAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI .. RESPONDENT
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1438 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (Per THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)
Learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submitted that the subject matter of this writ appeal is identical to that of W.A.No.315 of 2012 disposed of by this Court on 14-08-2012 and can be disposed in terms of the said judgment.
In view of the above submission, this writ appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this court in W.A.No.315 of 2012 disposed of on 14-08-2012.
( PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ )
( VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,
J )
Dt: 20-11-2012.
TNB
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.A.No.315 of 2012Referred¶11
Challa Ram Reddy
Govt. of India Rep. by Its Deputy Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Freedom Fighters Division Loknayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
