12. Though there is dispute with regard to old survey number, it appears that the property claimed by the respondent and the subject matter before the Apex Court is one and the same and the same is covered in new Survey Nos. 22 and 24. In the S.L.P. filed by the revision petitioners, the Apex Court ordered to continue the status quo granted by this Court in the C.R.P. and also ordered that the proceedings as directed by this Court shall not be initiated without the leave of the Apex Court. In that view of the matter, the respondent cannot take stand that the orders passed by the Apex Court apply only to the parties before it, and they are not applicable to him. It is settled law that any party having the semblance of right or interest in any suit schedule property, pending before any Court, including the Apex Court, the orders passed by any Court including the Apex Court are binding on them, as rightly contended on behalf of the revision petitioners. Therefore, the orders passed by the Apex Court are not only binding on the parties before it, but also on all those who have semblance of right or interest in the subject property. The orders passed by the Apex Court are the law under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. The findings of the trial Court that the respondent is not a party to the proceedings either in the C.R.P. or the proceedings in the S.L.P. before the Apex Court and that the order of the Apex Court that the proceedings as directed by this Court in C.R.P. No.1104 of 2004 shall not be initiated without the leave of the Apex Court is only binding on the respondents in the S.L.P, are not sustainable.
