Meka Veera Venkata Ramesh, v. The State of a.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal revision case was dismissed as abated because the petitioner-accused expired during the pendency of the proceedings.
The criminal revision case was dismissed as abated because the petitioner-accused expired during the pendency of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1138 of 2005
ORDER:
When this matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented that the petitioner-accused expired.
Recording the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated.
_________________ Justice Raja Elango
Dated: 15.11.2012 Nn.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
Crl.R.C. No.1138 of 2005
15.11.2012
Nn.
Petitioner-Accused
Raja Elango
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court