Konukollu Renuka, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a thin order where the High Court recorded the filing of a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail but did not provide reasoning or a specific textual order granting or dismissing the prayer.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8568 of 2012
Kanukollu Renuka, W/o. Saibabu
Petitioner/Accused
AND
The State of A.P., through its Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam P.S., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. D.V. CHALAPATHI RAO Counsel for the Respondent THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/Accused in the event of arrest in connection with FIR.No.414 of 2012, dated 02-08-2012 on the file of the SHO, Ibrahimpatnam P.S., Krishna District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible to be granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kanukollu Renuka
- respondent
The State of A.P.
Coram
B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/8568/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court