Allowed

M/s. New Sarika Cotton Traders, v. The State of A.P.

Telangana HC7 Aug 2012CRLP/5986/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of an anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding Crime No. 119 of 2012. The Court released the petitioners on bail pending further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 119 of 2012.

M/s. New Sarika Cotton Traders, Vs The State of A.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE

¶3

: PRESENT :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5986 of 2012.

¶6

Between:-

¶7

1.M/s. New Sarika Cotton Traders, Rep. by its Partner, Mr. Kuppam Venkata Prasad

¶8

2.Kuppam Venkata Prasad S/o. K. Veeraiah.

¶9

..Petitioners (Accused Nos. 1 & 2 in Crime No. 119 of 2012 of the Central Crime Station, Hyderabad.)

¶10

And

¶11

The State of A.P., through by SHO, Central Crime Police Station, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

¶12

..Respondent

¶13

Complainant in-do-

¶14

Petition under Section 438 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 on bail in the event of their arrest by the Police, CCS, Hyderabad in connection with Crime No. 119 of 2012.

¶15

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. Harinath Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶16

The Court made the following ORDER:-

¶17

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

for ASSISTANT

REGISTRAR

1.The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. 2.The XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 3.The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyd(OUT) 5.One CC to Sri P. Harinath Gupta, Advocate(OPUC). 6.One Spare copy.

TKK

HIGH COURT

SGR.J

DT.07-08-2012.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶28

CRL.P.NO. 5986 OF 2012.

¶29

RELEASE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL.

¶30

DRAFTED BY TKK DT.07-08-2012.

HIGH COURT

SGR.J

DT.07-082012.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER

¶35

CRL.P.No. 5986 OF 2012.

¶36

RELEASE THE PETITIONRS

¶37

ON BAIL.

M/s. New Sarika Cotton Traders, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. New Sarika Cotton Traders, v. The State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Gudishe Jithendar Yadav Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K.v.P.J.Ram Prasad, Vs Ramu Naik

Sri Vemula Prem Kumar Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Palakonda Prameela and 4 Others Vs Palakonda Geetha and Another

Pothina Ramana , Potti Ramana, Vs The State of A.P.

Kilar Anand Paul , K.a.Paul, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh