Uppalapati Anjaneya Vara Prasad (A-1) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.P.No.5299 of 2012. Counsel absent. Petition dismissed for want of representation.
Crl.P.No.5299 of 2012. Counsel absent. Petition dismissed for want of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Crl.P.No.5299 of 2012
ORDER:
The petitioners’ counsel is absent on both the
occasions when the matter is called. There is no
representation.
Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J
Dt. 4th July, 2012
PNV
The Petitioners
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court