The court dismissed the criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail, finding the petition not maintainable due to the previous dismissal of a similar application and lack of proof of changed circumstances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Crl.P.No.4869 of 2012
ORDER:
Previous anticipatory bail application of the petitioner in Crl.P.No.3919 of 20012 was dismissed by this Court on merits on 26.04.2012. There is no proof of change of circumstances thereafter. Hence, this petition is not maintainable in law.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J Dt. 4th July, 2012
PNV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail given the previous dismissal of their application and no proof of changed circumstances.
Petitioner
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
