The Company Court allowed the company application seeking permission to withdraw the accompanying company petition, which was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw C.P.No.21 of 2012 was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
COMPANY APPLICATION No.260 of 2012
and COMPANY PETITION No.21 of 2012
ORDER:
C.A.No.260 of 2012 is filed by the petitioner, under Rule 100 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, seeking permission to withdraw C.P.No.21 of 2012.
Permission is accorded.
C.A.No.260 of 2012 is allowed, and C.P.No.21 of 2012 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
Date:24.02.2012 usd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the civil petition be accorded under Rule 100 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner (of C.A.No.260 of 2012)
Respondent (of C.P.No.21 of 2012)
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
