An appeal was dismissed for default as the appellants failed to appear when the matter was listed for dismissal on two occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD
C.M.A. No.623 OF 2010
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana)
On 12.12.2011, when the matter was taken up, none appeared for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants though the matter is under the caption “for dismissal”.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
_______________ N.V.RAMANA, J
___________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J Dated: 13.12.2011 Nn
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA &
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD
C.M.A.No.623 OF 2010
(Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana)
Nn
13.12.2011
N.V. Ramana
P. Durga Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
