A criminal compoundable compromise appeal was dismissed by the court for non-prosecution as counsel for the appellants appeared without instructions.
Compounded Crime Appeal No. 46 of 1992 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO
CCC APPEAL No.46 OF 1992
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed)
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 05-03-3012 as none appeared for the appellants, it was directed to be posted on 0603-2012 under the caption ‘for dismissal.’
2. Today, Sri T. Bheemsen, learned counsel for the appellants appeared and submitted that he has no instructions in the matter.
3. Hence, the CCC Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
March 06, 2012.
K.S. APPA RAO, J
KTL
Ghulam Mohammed
K. S. Appa Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
