The appeal filed by A.P. State Road Transport Corporation was dismissed for non-prosecution, as no representation was filed despite several opportunities afforded to the appellant. No order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
C.M.A. No.2525 of 2003
Date: February 23, 2012
Between: A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Vice-Chairman-cumManaging Director, Hyderabad. … Appellant
and
1. Gorla Jnanayya & 3 others … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
C.M.A. No.2525 of 2003
JUDGMENT:
There is no representation for the appellant-APSRTC in spite of affording several opportunities. The appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
_____________________ R. KANTHA RAO, J.
Date: February 23, 2012. BSB
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
C.M.A. No.2525 of 2003
Date: February 23, 2012
BSB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appeal filed by the appellant-State Road Transport Corporation.
A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Hyderabad
Gorla Jnanayya
R. KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
