Dismissed
Prathi Koteswara Rao v. Mr. Jagan Mohan Rao
Telangana HCCC/703/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
CONTEMPT CASE No.703 of 2011 In
W.P.No.4321 of 2011
Between: Prathi Koteswara Rao
PETITIONER
AND Mr.Jagan Mohan Rao
.....RESPONDENT
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
CONTEMPT CASE No.703 of 2011 In
W.P.No.4321 of 2011
ORDER:
The petitioner has filed the present contempt case, wherein it has been averred that the respondent herein has disobeyed the orders dated 23.02.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4321/2011, vide which, this Court directed the respondent herein to consider the
application filed by the petitioner dated 13.04.2010 in terms of G.O.Ms.No.743, dated 30.04.1963, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
Counter has been filed on behalf of the respondent, wherein it has been averred that the application of the petitioner has been got enquired into and on enquiry, it has come to the notice that the lands applied for by the petitioner are classified in the revenue records as Sy.No.279/30 – Reserve forest and Sy.No.590/4 – Vagu (stream).
It is stated that in view of the fact that the lands applied for by the petitioner are classified as reserve forest and Vagu (stream), therefore, the application put in by the petitioner for assignment of the aforementioned lands cannot be assigned under the Rules in force.
In view of the fact that the application of the petitioner has been duly considered and the request of the petitioner for assigning the aforementioned lands is rejected as they are reserve forest and Vagu (stream) respectively, therefore, there is no merit in the contempt case, and no contempt has been made out against the respondent.
The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed.
______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J
Dated: 16.02.2012 Dsr
Prathi Koteswara Rao
Mr. Jagan Mohan Rao
Ashutosh Mohanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court