This order addresses the closure of a contempt case filed alleging violation of a prior judgment. The court found that a counter-affidavit filed by the fourth respondent explained subsequent events, rendering further enquiry unnecessary and closing the case.
Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No.503 OF 2005
DATED: 17.02.2012
Between:
Cheruku Narasimha Reddy (Died) per LRs.
1. Cheruku Ananda Reddy
2. Cheruku Mahender Reddy
3. Cheruku Manohar Reddy … Petitioners
And
1. Mr. Vinod K. Agarwal, IAS, Director of Survey & Land Records, A.P., Mukaramjahai Road, Hyderabad, and 3 others. … Respondents
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No.503 OF 2005
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 21.05.2002 in WPMP.No.11924 of 2002 in W.P.No.9698 of 2002.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. In the light of the counter-affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, explaining the subsequent events, the matter does not warrant further enquiry.
Accordingly the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
______________ G. ROHINI, J.
Dt. 17.02.2012 gbs
Cheruku Ananda Reddy
Cheruku Mahender Reddy
Cheruku Manohar Reddy
Mr. Vinod K. Agarwal, IAS
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
