In a withdrawn contempt case, the Acting Chief Justice recorded the submission to withdraw the matter and dismissed the contempt case accordingly.
the contempt case was dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1000 OF 2012
Dt: 18-09-2012.
Between:
GARIGIPATI SRI RAMALINGESWARA RAO AND ANOTHER .. APPELLANTS
AND
SRI.T.CHANDRASEKHARA NAIDU .. RESPONDENT
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1000 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (Per THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this Contempt Case.
Recording the submission, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
( PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ )
( VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,
J )
Dt: 18-09-2012.
TNB
Garigipati Sri Ramalingeswara Rao and Another
Sri. T. Chandrasekhara Naidu
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
