The appeal was dismissed for default because the respondent died, no LR petition was filed, and the appellants were not present.
The Appeal is accordingly dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
A.S. No.2311 of 1993
Between: Paniki Manikyamma and 3 others
..... APPELLANTS
And
Pamala Veeraswamy
.....RESPONDENT
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
A.S.No.2311 of 1993
JUDGMENT:
When the matter came up for hearing on 19.07.2012, it is represented that the sole respondent died on 06.06.2010 and a memo was also filed to that effect, and hence the matter is posted for steps.
As per the note put up by the office no LR petition was filed in this appeal. Present none for the appellants and no representation on
their behalf. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
____________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J
Dated: 16.08.2012 Dsr
Paniki Manikyamma and 3 others
Pamala Veeraswamy
N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
