The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, dismissed an appeal for default because steps were not taken by the appellant. The court noted that a legal remedy petition was not filed and the appeal against the second respondent had been previously dismissed.
Appeal dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
A.S. No.2032 of 1993
Between: Kandikoppu Chitti Venkanna and another
..... APPELLANTS
And
Gulam Mohammad Sherif and another
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
A.S.No.2032 of 1993
JUDGMENT:
When the matter came up for hearing on 19.07.2012, it is represented that the 1st respondent died and hence the matter is posted for steps.
As per the note put up by the office, no LR petition is filed in this appeal. The appeal was already dismissed against the 2nd
respondent for default as per orders dated 09.02.2010. Steps not taken for the 1st respondent and hence the Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
____________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J
Dated: 16.08.2012 Dsr
Kandikoppu Chitti Venkanna
second appellant
Gulam Mohammad Sherif
second respondent
N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
