Smt. C. Prameela Vs The District Collector, Ananthapur

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

WRIT PETITIONS No. 8171, 8183, 8185, 8190, 8191, 8195, 8197 and 8199 of 2011

COMMON ORDER:

Learned Government Pleader for Revenue, who has received instructions in the matter, submits that the petitioners have not presented any document for registration, before the 3^rd respondent Sub-Registrar, Anantapur Rural, as alleged in the Writ Petitions, but however, the learned Government Pleader has pointed out that the land with which the writ petitioners are said to be concerned is, undoubtedly, an assigned land, but the assignments seem to have taken place somewhere in the year 1928, as can be made out from the report of the Tahasildar, Anantapur submitted to the Collector, Anantapur on 11.12.2010. It will be appropriate in this connection, to notice that for the first time, prohibition of alienation of assigned lands was contemplated by the government somewhere during the year 1954. It is therefore, clear that prior to 1954, lands, which have been assigned, are not strictly prohibited from being alienated and hence, lands, which are assigned prior to 1954, need not be held back for the purpose of registration of sale transactions.

¶5

In view of the statement of the learned Government Pleader that no document has been presented for registration purposes before the 3^rd respondent, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3^rd respondent to deal with any such document which the writ petitioners might present in accordance with law, provided the lands are assigned originally prior to 1954 and if that be so, the 3^rd respondent may proceed to register the same, if the document is otherwise in order and act in accordance with law.

¶6

With this, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

¶7

---------------------------------(NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J)

¶8

6^th June 2011 ksld

Smt. C. Prameela v. The District Collector, Ananthapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. C. Prameela v. The District Collector, Ananthapur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Mutti Subrahmanyam, Vs Smt. Landa Arunakumari

Smt. Sadguna Vs a.Anjaiah , Anjaneyulu Goud

R.Yoganad , Yoganand, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kurapati Upender Vs Sri a. Sadanandam, Registrar

Smt. D. Manjula Vs The District Collector, Ananthapur

M. Aruna Kumari Vs The District Collector