The writ petition was dismissed for being infructuous as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause of action did not survive for adjudication. No specific relief is detailed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.7442 OF 2000
DATE: 27.12.2011
BETWEEN: Dr G.Venkateswara Rao .. Petitioner And State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Secretary and others .. Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.7442 OF 2000
OREDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication; therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ R.KANTHA RAO,J
Dated: 27.12.2011 kvrm
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.7442 OF 2000
DATE: 27.12.2011
Dr G. Venkateswara Rao
State of Andhra Pradesh
R. Kantha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
